Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"Environmentalists Eye Power Plants After Supreme Court Ruling"

"The Supreme Court’s embrace of a new standard for federal water permitting puts a bull’s-eye on power plant waste sites, environmentalists say.

The high court on Thursday ruled that water pollution that takes an indirect route from a discrete source to a federally regulated waterway needs a Clean Water Act permit when it’s the “functional equivalent” of a direct discharge.

The justices rejected arguments from the Trump administration and industry lawyers that such indirect pollution falls beyond the scope of the federal permitting program, concluding in a 6-3 opinion that the approach would open a huge loophole in the law.

While the case focused on a wastewater plant in Maui County, Hawaii, the decision will have ripple effects for other pollution sources, especially the power sector."

Ellen M. Gilmer reports for Bloomberg Environment April 24, 2020.

Source: Bloomberg Environment, 04/27/2020