Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

That Sustainable Seafood Label You're Believing Might Be Crap: Report

"Another black eye for the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC)—which is failing its own strict standards for awarding its coveted 'sustainable' label. This according to a group of researchers, whose analysis published in Biological Conservation found that 'the MSC’s principles for sustainable fishing are too lenient and discretionary, and allow for overly generous interpretation by third-party certifiers and adjudicators, which means that the MSC label may be misleading both consumers and conservation funders.'"



"The MSC was formed in 1997 by the World Wildlife Fund, one of the world's biggest environmental groups, and Unilever, one of the world's biggest seafood processors, which together wanted to provide 'the best environmental choice in seafood.' But as I've reported here, here, here, and here—and as MoJo's Tom Philpott reported recently here—the prestige of the MSC sustainable blue label has been eroded, strenuously challenged, and at times belittled by scientific assessment of the fisheries and by genetic analysis of the fish going to market."

Julia Whitty reports for Mother Jones April 12, 2013.

Source: Mother Jones, 04/12/2013