Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"How Politics Is Shaping Biden’s Infrastructure Proposal"

"From weatherization funds to electric vehicles, the White House made compromises to enlist a broad coalition that includes labor and communities of color"

"When it comes to the beneficiaries of President Biden’s infrastructure proposal, the Weatherization Assistance Program ranks among the big winners. The White House touted it as part of its $213 billion effort to build, preserve and retrofit homes, predicting it will “put union building trade workers to work upgrading homes and businesses to save families money.”

There’s just one problem: Independent analyses suggest that the program — which got its last big boost under the 2009 stimulus bill — isn’t a cost-efficient climate strategy. “As a pure carbon fighting policy, it looks expensive and low bang for the buck,” said University of Chicago professor Michael Greenstone, who studied efficiency efforts after leaving the Obama White House.

The weatherization plan is one of several embedded in Biden’s infrastructure proposal that reflect how political pragmatism has shaped the new administration’s governing style. Rather than seek the perfect policy answer — an approach touted by the Obama administration — they are focused on solutions that can muster a broad base of support. The plan also includes funding electric vehicles without setting a timeline for when the nation will stop selling gas-powered cars and trucks, and funding highly subsidized inland waterways without spelling out how much industry will pay for new locks and dams."

Juliet Eilperin, Michael Laris, and Jeff Stein report for the Washington Post April 20, 2021.

SEE ALSO:

"Why a Shift From the United Mine Workers Is So Important" (MSNBC)

"Biden Holds Bipartisan Infrastructure Talks At White House" (NPR)

"Progressives Propose Tripling Housing Commitment in Infrastructure Plan" (New York Times)

"A Majority of Americans Support Biden’s Infrastructure Plan" (U.S. News)

"Kamala Harris Turns Road Warrior For The Biden Infrastructure And Jobs Plan" (Los Angeles Times)

"Clean Energy, Labor Clashes Reveal Biden's CO2 Challenge" (E&E News)

"As States Thwart Climate Progress, Progressives Pitch A Lifeline To Green Cities" (HuffPost)

"Progressives Formally Reintroduce the Green New Deal" (Politico)

"The Nation’s Biggest Miner Union Is Ready for a Transition to Clean Energy" (Earther)

Source: Washington Post, 04/21/2021