Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

Supreme Court Deals Blow to Out-of-State FOIA Requesters

May 8, 2013

Journalists doing investigations in states other than the one they reside in may face new obstacles after an April 29, 2013, US Supreme Court decision on state freedom-of-information laws.

The unanimous decision held that state FOI laws could restrict the right of access to state government records to citizens of that particular state. The case, McBurney v. Young, involved a request by California resident Roger Hurlbert for Henrico County, Va., records. He sought them in the course of his business collecting real estate records for clients.

According to the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, only a "handful" of states have similar residents-only restrictions to their FOI laws (they incude Alabama, Arkansas, New Hampshire, New Jersey and Tennessee).

But the doctrinal impact of the decision is likely to be large, since the court held, among other things, that the First Amendment conveys no right of access to government information.

SEJ Publication Types: 
Topics on the Beat: 
Visibility: