Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

Justice Department Says Citizens Can Record Police Activity

May 30, 2012

During the years after 9/11, it was common for police to stop journalists or activists photographing a chemical plant or port facility and tell them it was illegal. It wasn't. Wise journalists — even if they were doing a story on chemical safety — usually stated their rights before obeying police orders. Now a new Justice Department statement bolsters the argument that police can not merely make up rules about press access on a whim.

In a May 14, 2012 letter to the Baltimore Police Department, the Justice Department said that individuals have a First Amendment right to record police officers in the public performance of their duties. It also said police can not seize or destroy such recordings without a warrant and due process. The story was reported originally by Wired.

The Justice Department opinion gains extra significance because of the increasing prevalence of cell phones that can record photos, sound, and video.

SEJ Publication Types: 
Visibility: