Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

At Industry Urging, White House Buries Report on Toxic Threats to Children's Health

January 2, 2013

If you want to know the latest on what chemicals might give your kids learning disabilities, asthma, and other health problems, the White House Office of Management and Budget intends to keep you in the dark. At OMB, which has no scientific expertise, the concerns of industry trump the concerns of parents and doctors.

OMB, at industry’s urging, has buried for some 21 months the third edition of an EPA report entitled "America's Children and the Environment." OMB has previously been criticized for tampering with science produced by actual scientists to meet the political agendas of big-money industry lobbies.

Independent reporter Sheila Kaplan broke the story via American University's Investigative Reporting Workshop. Kaplan, an award-winning journalist specializing in money, politics, and public health, is currently a Lab Fellow with the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University.

The EPA report was posted in draft form in March 2011. But like many other scientific studies and regulatory actions from EPA, it had to undergo 'review' by OMB before it could become final. The legality of OMB's claims of such authority under various executive orders is dubious, but has rarely if ever been challenged in court.

SEJ Publication Types: 
Visibility: