SEJournal Online is the digital news magazine of the Society of Environmental Journalists. Learn more about SEJournal Online, including submission, subscription and advertising information.
The release this month of the draft National Climate Assessment garnered many headlines. But little notice went to the fact that it was released at all. Earlier versions of this assessment of climate change's impacts on the U.S. were suppressed — and even "unpublished" — by the Bush White House politicos at the urging of fossil-fuel industries and anti-regulatory lobby groups.
A few voices did take note. Rick Piltz, who helped document how an oil company lobbyist rewrote federal climate science for the Bush White House, posted a piece about it on his Climate Science Watch blog. Piltz blew the whistle on Bush-era corruption of science — supplying full documentation — after several years at an insider's seat in the US Global Change Research Program.
Another was Chris Mooney, a science writer who specializes in chronicling the frictions between politics and science. His story for Mother Jones put the new assessment in context of a decade of suppression. He told the story more extensively in his book, The Republican War on Science, and a 2007 article in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
The Assessment is important because it is one of the few authoritative statements about the real and potential impacts climate change will have on the backyards and daily lives of Americans. In a 1990 law, Congress required the executive branch to produce it every four years, and a court eventually ruled the Bush administration's refusal to produce it illegal.
- "New National Climate Assessment Draft Report a Reminder of the First NCA and the Bush White House Denial Machine," Climate Science Watch, January 28, 2013, by Rick Piltz.
- "Could This Scary Report Get Americans To Care About Climate?" Mother Jones/Climate Desk, January 15, 2013, by Chris Mooney.
- "Bush Aide Softened Greenhouse Gas Links to Global Warming," New York Times, June 8, 2005, by Andrew C. Revkin.
- "An Inconvenient Assessment," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, November/December 2007, by Chris Mooney.
- Previous SEJ Stories: WatchDog of January 13, 2010; TipSheet of May 28, 2008; TipSheet of December 23, 2009.