Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"Texas Pushing Back as Feds Move To Reduce Coal-Fired Plants"

"Texas is not Kentucky. Or West Virginia. That's clear to everyone.

But there's conflict over what these distinctions mean when it comes to President Barack Obama's plan to sharply reduce climate-altering pollution from coal-fired power plants, the nation's leading source of carbon dioxide emissions.

All three states burn a lot of coal, but Texas says it shouldn't be forced to make deeper emissions cuts than Kentucky and West Virginia. The reason: It's already moving toward more climate-friendly electricity through the use of natural gas and wind, while the other two states remain devoted to coal."

Matthew Tresaugue reports for the Houston Chronicle December 28, 2014.

Source: Houston Chronicle, 12/30/2014