Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"Scientists See Double Standard in Critique of Altered Foods"

"Genetic engineering of crops is essentially the same as centuries-old, conventional plant breeding, except more precise, scientists say." As voting time nears on California's Proposition 37, arguments about science, safety, and the public's right to know intensify.



Rosie Mestel reports for the Los Angeles Times October 25, 2012.

SEE ALSO:

"Some Studies Question Safety of Genetically Modified Foods" (Los Angeles Times)

"Scientists Defend Safety of Genetically Modified Foods" (Los Angeles Times)

"Proposition 37, GMO Labeling Mandate, Wins Support Of 100 Celebrity Chefs" (Huffington Post)

"Some Valley Growers Back Prop. 37" (Fresno Bee)

"Clinicians Point to GMO Safety Concerns" (Epoch Times)
 

Source: LA Times, 10/25/2012