Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"Regan's Contentious Bid To Reset EPA Scientific Integrity"

"When EPA Administrator Michael Regan fired every member of two science advisory panels in March, he was trying to send an unequivocal message: It's a new day for scientific integrity.

It was a hardball maneuver by EPA's new chief, who came to the job with a national reputation for his work forging consensus as a regulator in North Carolina. He had just taken over a federal agency where career scientists and civil servants felt diminished and attacked under the Trump administration.

In remarks to EPA employees after he was sworn in last month, Regan promised to "restore the role of science and transparency" at the agency. From where he sat, that could only begin with a clean slate of independent science advisers.

But what was heralded by Regan's champions and science boosters as a bold reset for EPA has unsettled Republicans since he won bipartisan Senate confirmation to the post."

Kevin Bogardus reports for E&E News April 27, 2021.

Source: E&E News, 04/28/2021