Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"Pesticides: Court Reverses Key Part Of Challenge To EPA Registrations"

"A federal appeals court [Thursday] breathed new life into a challenge by environmental groups to U.S. EPA's registration of nearly 400 pesticides.

The Center for Biological Diversity and Pesticide Action Network North America filed the large lawsuit contending that EPA should have consulted the Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service when it considered the reregistration of pesticides containing 31 different active ingredients.

They filed complaints that ran over 450 pages, and a district court ruled for EPA and virtually every major agribusiness group that intervened on behalf of the agency.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals largely upheld that decision today, but it reversed the ruling on one key aspect and sent it back to federal district court for further consideration.

Specifically, the challengers alleged that for each of those 31 active ingredients, EPA failed to engage in the consultation process with FWS and NMFS as required under the Endangered Species Act."

Jeremy P. Jacobs reports for Greenwire February 2, 2017.

Source: Greenwire, 02/03/2017