Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"New Pipeline Proposal Stokes Enviro Fears of A Keystone XL East"

"Environmentalists battling Canadian oil companies over the proposed Keystone XL pipeline to the Gulf Coast and another link west to Asia are now girding for what they see as industry's Plan C: Move heavy crude to the East.

At issue is a plan announced this week by Enbridge Pipelines Inc. to reverse the flow of a pipeline that now carries 240,000 daily barrels of imported oil west from Canada's East Coast.

The pipeline company paints its proposal in the same hue that the White House has used in extolling the economic upside of the United States' current oil boom, emphasizing the value to Canadians of relying more on their nation's presently underpriced oil sands crude, but environmentalists see a bigger game afoot.

'It sounds like it really is Trailbreaker in disguise,' Conservation Law Foundation attorney Ivy Frignoca said in an interview, referring to the East Coast project that Enbridge jettisoned in 2009 at the height of the global economic slump."

Elana Schor reports for Greenwire May 18, 2012.

Source: Greenwire, 05/21/2012