Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"Water Rule Injunction Adds Confusion to Biden’s Protection Plan"

"A federal court injunction this week against the Biden administration’s new waters protection rule in 24 states sparked questions over the clarity and path forward for the rule, even if the action doesn’t dramatically change which waters are protected.

“All the judge has really done is enjoin a somewhat clearer explanation of the law,” without upending the overall legal regime governing wetlands and rivers protection, said Dave Owen, a law professor at the University of California College of the Law-San Francisco.

President Joe Biden offered a rule earlier this year to help protect water quality in rivers and streams and determine where and how homes, mines, highways, and other development can be built if they touch wetlands or waterways.

Republican-led states, along with agriculture and business groups, opposed the rule, filing several lawsuits across the US asking for the proposal to be blocked."

Bobby Magill reports for Bloomberg Environment April 13, 2023.

Source: Bloomberg Environment, 04/18/2023