Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

SEJ Joins Amicus Challenge of FOIA "Deliberative" Loophole

The Society of Environmental Journalists joined 28 other journalism groups intervening in a court argument over overuse of the "deliberative process" exemption to the Freedom of Information Act.

The underlying case, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service v. Sierra Club, concerns science agency advice to the Environmental Protection Agency over possibly harmful effects of utility cooling water. Environmental groups tried to get the documents under FOIA, but the agencies argued that their advice was exempt because it was "predecisional." The groups are arguing that the executive branch overuses the "deliberative" exemption. The other agencies involved are the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service.

Environmental groups won their case on appeal, and it is now before the U.S. Supreme Court. A coalition of journalism groups, led by the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, filed an amicus brief Aug. 3 supporting rejection of the "deliberative" exemption in this case -- and release of the information.