Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"Unbalanced Climate-Change Hearing Proves Pointless"

"The House Science Committee convened a hearing on climate-change science Wednesday morning and it went just as I expected. We learned little, and political theater upstaged almost all productive discussion of science.

The witness panel, dominated by selections from the Republican majority, engaged in a fruitless debate over climate-change science fundamentals rather than advancing new, productive ideas to manage the problem.

[These scientists want to create ‘red teams’ to challenge climate research. Congress is listening.]

Mainstreams scientists were dismayed by the tenor and substance of the discussion:"

Jason Samenow reports for the Washington Post March 29, 2017.

SEE ALSO:

"US Hearing On Climate Science Focuses On Name Calling" (Associated Press)

"A Scientist Just Spent 2 Hours Debating the Biggest Global Warming Deniers in Congress" (Mother Jones)

"Campaign To Spread Climate Doubt Picks Up Steam" (ClimateWire)

"Climate: Rep. Smith Pans Science In Heated Hearing" (Greenwire)
 

Source: Washington Post, 03/30/2017