Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"Supreme Court Wetlands Ruling Imperils Waters on Public Lands"

"Wetlands and waterways in national parks, monuments, forests and other federal public lands are newly vulnerable to pollution and development in the wake of the Supreme Court’s May ruling in Sackett v. EPA, natural resources attorneys say.

But because federal lands have some protection under the National Environmental Policy Act and a raft of other laws, there is broad disagreement among attorneys about how Sackett affects public land.

Sackett creates a federal jurisdictional test for waters and wetlands “that is divorced from science” and will “disempower federal land managers from protecting critical water resources on public lands,” said Craig Galli, senior partner at Holland & Hart LLP in Salt Lake City and a distinguished practitioner in residence at Brigham Young University Law School."

Bobby Magill reports for Bloomberg Environment August 3, 2023.

Source: Bloomberg Environment, 08/03/2023