Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"OMB Endocrine Directive Draws Industry Cheers, Enviro Jeers"

"The Office of Management and Budget has instructed U.S. EPA to use existing toxicity data rather than require companies to conduct new tests to determine whether chemicals can damage the human endocrine system.

At issue in the White House directive is the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program created by the 1998 Food Quality Protection Act to identify chemicals that can disrupt reproductive systems.

EPA started the program in April with the announcement of the first 67 pesticides for screening with a "Tier 1" goal of identifying possible endocrine disruptors and requiring that they be tested by their manufacturers. The program's second tier is aimed at determining safe exposure levels for such chemicals.

OMB issued the directive last week, after EPA submitted a request for additional information. The White House approved EPA's request to collect additional data for the 67 chemicals but warned the agency that it should "to the greatest extent possible" accept existing data to satisfy test requirements.

The OMB directive, which observers say contained unusually strong language, is being hailed by industry groups that had been concerned about the prospects for expensive testing mandates."

Sara Goodman reports for Greenwire in the New York Times October 15, 2009.

Source: Greenwire, 10/16/2009