Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"Mine Operators Not Restoring Mountains, OSM Report Finds"

"CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- Coal operators in Southern West Virginia are not restoring large strip-mining sites to their 'approximate original contour,' despite a state policy change meant to require such reclamation, according to a previously unpublished federal government report.

U.S. Office of Surface Mining investigators found that reclaimed mining sites were left much lower in elevation than required to meet the approximate original contour formula spelled out in their approved permit applications.

In one of the eight instances examined by OSM -- the most extreme example in the federal agency study -- the mine operator left the land more than 200 feet lower than required by a permit approved by the state Department of Environmental Protection.

Under federal law, mine operators must generally put strip mine sites back the way they were prior to mining. The law calls this 'approximate original contour,' or AOC. In limited circumstances, operators that proposed post-mining development can leave mined sites flattened or with gently rolling hills."

Ken Ward Jr. reports for the Charleston Gazette July 25, 2009.

Source: Charleston Gazette, 07/27/2009