Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"Jobs, Security to Matter in Designating ‘Critical Habitats’"

"The federal government may not deem an area with imperiled plants and animals to be a “critical habitat” if doing so would cause economic harm or national security problems, under proposed rules announced Friday.

The announcement by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service sparked the ire of environmental groups that fear the proposal would further harm species on the brink of extinction, especially as climate change affects their habitats.

The proposed rules would affect how the Fish and Wildlife Service decides what land could be excluded from a critical habitat designation. The plan appeared in a Federal Register pre-publication notice. A 30-day public comment period begins next week."

Bobby Magill reports for Bloomberg Environment September 4, 2020.

SEE ALSO:

"Endangered Species: Trump Admin Proposal Could Shrink Critical Habitat" (E&E News)

Source: Bloomberg Environment, 09/07/2020