Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

Critics Question Data Used In Rule Replacing Obama Water Protections

"Critics say the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) water policy unveiled Thursday is one of the biggest rollbacks to water policy in decades, but it’s tough to know the extent of its impact because of challenges that come with mapping America’s waterways.

“I’ve never seen an EPA regulation so utterly divorced from the facts and so apparently uninterested in developing them,” said Jon Devine, the Natural Resources Defense Council’s director of federal water policy.

The new rule limits the small streams and waterbodies covered by the Clean Water Act, raising fears that an increased amount of pesticides and other industrial chemicals will be able to enter streams, wetlands and underground water sources."

Rachel Frazin reports for The Hill January 24, 2020.

SEE ALSO:

"EPA Scientists Slam Trump’s Waters Rule Rewrite" (Bloomberg Environment)

"EPA Science Advisory Board Criticizes WOTUS Proposal" (Agri-Pulse)

"Aquatic Scientists Criticize Revised Definition Of Waters Of The U.S." (Consortium of Aquatic Science Societies release)

"WOTUS Review Stumps Advisers: 'The Science Isn't Right'" (Greenwire)

Source: The Hill, 01/28/2020