Cookie Control

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer.

Some cookies on this site are essential, and the site won't work as expected without them. These cookies are set when you submit a form, login or interact with the site by doing something that goes beyond clicking on simple links.

We also use some non-essential cookies to anonymously track visitors or enhance your experience of the site. If you're not happy with this, we won't set these cookies but some nice features of the site may be unavailable.

By using our site you accept the terms of our Privacy Policy.

(One cookie will be set to store your preference)
(Ticking this sets a cookie to hide this popup if you then hit close. This will not store any personal information)

"Battle Over Chemical Used to Make Non-Stick Pans Heats Up"

"TRENTON -- A large manufacturer and user of a chemical in non-stick cookware and stain resistant fabrics is pressing New Jersey state regulators to reduce what could amount to a multi-billion dollar water cleanup bill.

The tug-of-war between the state of New Jersey and DuPont over perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOA, in drinking water has reached a critical stage, according to documents posted Wednesday by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, PEER.

In an unusual move, DuPont consultants are being allowed to make a presentation to the state Drinking Water Quality Institute which develops recommended standards for hazardous contaminants in drinking water.

On Friday, Dr. Robert Tardiff of the Sapphire Group, which is advising DuPont, will speak to the Institute on PFOA risk assessment. The meeting is with the full Institute rather than with its Health Effects Subcommittee which is responsible for recommending health based levels for the contaminants.

There has been no public notice of this meeting and it is unclear if the public or press may attend, says PEER Executive Director attorney Jeff Ruch.

'This departure from protocol seems to be an attempt to sway members of the Institute before they have a chance to analyze DEP’s own risk assessment,' said Ruch, noting that the Institute is not bound by state open meeting laws. 'Polluters should not get a seat at the table where it is decided how harmful their pollution is.'"

Environment News Service had the story August 6, 2009.

Source: ENS, 08/07/2009